Thursday, 20 October 2016

"America is great, because America is good."

"America is great, because America is good," according to Hillary Clinton.

No Hillary, America is not good. She was once, she is no longer.

Lest I offend my many loyal American readers, my own country, Canada; is not good either.

Our nations have advocated and aggressively promoted the slaughter of innocents in the womb. On this, America has led the way for the whole world. Sixty, maybe seventy million - 70,000,000 babies murdered since Roe vs. Wade. The eldest would be young grandparents today, the loss of population so far is perhaps 90,000,000. One wonders what is wrong with the economy? The economic contributors were murdered or never conceived by those who were. I apologise for putting people in economic terms but it does highlight the issue quite dramatically.

Hillary Clinton wants every American Christian to now pay for baby murder.

Canada has already embraced euthanasia; American states are individually rushing towards that abyss.

The United States of America, has destroyed Syria, Iraq, Libya and is now provoking a potential confrontation with Russia. Russia is not America's enemy, she is not Canada's enemy. Imagine if a Russian and American president could sit down together. Imagine if these two nation-states could join forces to defeat our real enemy.

No, America is not good. It lost that claim a long time ago.

But it can be.

Image result for our lady of america

Our Lady of America, Our Lady of Tepeyac pray for Americans, pray for all of us.

Commie Catholics - their time is very, very short!

The Clinton conspiracy against the Catholic Church in America is nothing new. The effeminate shills such as Edward Beck, a Passionist priest in New York City are but another example of "useful idiots."

Truly, Edward Beck, also known as Father CNN, has his reward. As does Podesta, Palmieri and Tim Kaine, they too have theirs, and they will get theirs. Mark my words on that and it may be sooner, much sooner than they think. They can call themselves Catholic and hide behind it but remember friends. Judas Iscariot was one of the first Catholics and was condemned by Our Blessed Lord even before his actions, notwithstanding what Bergoglio might suggest.

I have written previously on the literal throwing under the bus of Catholic in Taiwan and mainland, communist China by Bergoglio in an attempt to appease the communist dictatorship there. It is a repeat of the Ostpolitik of Roncalli and Montini. Truly, do any of these aiders and abettors of communism deserve to be called Pope?

On October 13, the 99th anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima occurred. On that day, it passed with no notice from the Vatican whilst our Pope praised the man who fomented the revolt that lead to Illuminism, Freemasonry, Zionism sexual libertinism and Communism, the arch-heresiarch, Martin Luther. Imagine, a Pope of Rome praising Luther. I'm not sure Luther would be so pleased.

These communists have invaded the Catholic Church. Podesta and Palmieri and Kaine are but the latest pathetic examples of Catholics who compromised with the devil and communism. In Canada, we have our own long-standing examples. From Gregory Baum and Remi de Roo to Vernon James Weisgerber the former Archbishop of Winnipeg who worried more about plastic water bottles than butchered babies to Justin Trudeau who congratulates Planned Parenthood. Communists, all of them. Traitors of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

The judgement of Christ upon these malefactors will be tremendous. May they repent before that terrible day.

What is happening in our Church is not new. From the time of Luther which gave birth to the so-called "enlightenment," truth has been compromised and relativized. Bella Dodd told us what happened in the twentieth century. Those who were once accused of wearing tin-foiled hats are being exonerated. Oh, how we wish it were otherwise.

Wednesday, 19 October 2016

New Jesuit Superior General - a Marxist Revolutionary. Surely, you weren't surprised ...

Image result for Father Arturo Sosa Abascal

Rorate has the exclusive insight from one who knows him.

This man who has worked very hard all his life to re-interpret Christianity from a Marxist viewpoint, who has done not only “theoretical” work, but direct Revolutionary work, is the one that the Jesuits now have elected as their General. Perhaps the growing revolutionary moment in Colombia, checked by the population itself in the referendum that voted down Marxist demands that would have been inserted in their own Constitution -- and for which their president won, unsurprisingly, the Nobel Peace Prize), demands that. But one still remains mystified: what is it that the revolutionary are after, still? In Venezuela they have systematically destroyed the productive infrastructure, agriculture, industry, public administration, the courts, hospitals, schools, even the energy industry that supports the country; they have killed thousands of people, they have the country at the edge of disastrous famine never before seen in such scale in the Americas. What is it that they are after? Probably the only explanation is the utter destruction of God’s world in order to build “a New World” in history. May God protect us from the revolutionary underworld. May God convert the hearts and open the eyes of his people. And, above all, may Christ protect His Church.

Let us see in this the work of God. He is permitting this in order to speed His rescue. The election of Bergoglio may have been a diabolical act, but a diabolical act permitted by God in order to bring about true renewal which can only be through true restoration.

Something evil is coming our way. Out of it, we will, through the power of the Holy Spirit and the presence of Our Lord Jesus Christ, triumph because He already has.

Keep the faith and get ready; 2017 beckons, indeed, it is already here.

In the end ..

Image result for immaculate heart of mary icon

Tuesday, 18 October 2016

"Catholic" Justin Trudeau congratulations a century of racism and murder. Time for a formal excommunication from the Catholic Church!

This picture of his Twitter says it all.

But not really all.

These pictures say the rest.

Let us now go back four decades to his father, Pierre Elliot, the Jesuit educated Prime Minister who ushered in the first legalisation of abortion in Canada, though under severe restrictions which eventually were struck down by Canada's Supreme Court ironically using the same Prime Minister's, constitutional amendments.

“You know, at some point you are killing life in the foetus in self-defence – of what? Of the mother’s health or her happiness or of her social rights or her privilege as a human being? I think she should have to answer for it and explain. Now, whether it should be to three doctors or one doctor or to a priest or a bishop or to her mother-in-law is a question you might want to argue …. You do have a right over your own body – it is your body. But the foetus is not your body; it’s someone else’s body. And if you kill it, you’ll have to explain.”
The Rt. Hon. Pierre E. Trudeau, PC, QC, MP
Prime Minister of Canada
The Montreal Star, Thursday, May 25, 1972

Monday, 17 October 2016

Passionist Priest Edward Beck - How a narcissist prostitutes himself for Clinton and CNN

Image result for father edward beck
Passionist Priest Edward Beck
You're worried about some potty-mouth and unsubstantiated claims that are now being refuted by witnesses?

If you vote for Hillary Clinton, knowing her intentions on abortion and the Catholic Church, you will have participated in an evil act.

But you won't hear that from Edward Beck, a Passionist priest in New York City and a contributor to Crux and CNN. I have copied the Crux article below, lest they get any clicks out of it.

In an article on Crux, "Why Clinton campaign emails aren't necessarily anti-Catholic," this priest, Beck, takes the position that the greater offense and crime and presumably sin, is the hackers.

Beck goes on to add that Newman is a "Catholic." Well, Ed, so was Judas!

Beck has the temerity to write of "spin." Well, he should know what "spin" is because he just did it.


What our well-coiffed priest does not seem to get, you can't really block anyone from Twitter. First, if one does not log-in, one can see any page. Second. you can always take out an alternate account. 

Beck is a disgrace to the priesthood. A man who has spent far too much time in front of a mirror than the tabernacle has no business being a priest. He has no business telling Catholics that there is an "out" to vote for Hillary Clinton.

One look at Beck's Facebook page displays a dangerous narcissist for a priest. Where are his Superiors?

Image result for father edward beck

Donald J. Trump is a man with flaws. His behaviour is rough and he has said some unacceptable things in his life. Well surprise, who has not.  Is he suitable to be President? A lot more suitable than Hillary Clinton in one matter. He has promised to put forward a Supreme Court with pro-life Justices that may eventually be able to overturn Roe vs. Wade. Hillary Clinton will not only, not do that, but will aggressively expand the murder of children. 

Beck is nothing more than a shill for the Democratic Party and the American left. He is not of Christ but of the Father of Lies.

Think very carefully, Americans. 

Do you want to join Edward Beck before the LORD trying to explain yourself out of this?

And please, please, would you really want to be as stupid as us Canadians?

The Beck article

Some Catholics were left scratching their heads by the kerfuffle created by the revelation of hacked emails of the Clinton campaign.
Conservative Catholic groups and some members of the hierarchy were quick to accuse the writers of the emails of participating in an anti-Catholic smear. Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia called for an apology from the Clinton campaign.
“Of course it would be wonderful for the Clinton campaign to repudiate the content of these ugly WikiLeaks emails,” he said.
Catholic League President Bill Donohue said that John Podesta, campaign chair for Clinton, should be fired for his participation in the controversial email exchange:  “He is fomenting revolution in the Catholic Church, creating mutiny and is totally unethical.”
Not all Catholics agree with such grandiose assessments, which suggest a nefarious plot against the Catholic Church.  More progressive Catholics view the email exchange as an honest dialogue - intended to be private - between people (all Catholics themselves, by the way) discussing how to respond to a conservative element in the Catholic Church that seems intent on turning back the advances of Vatican II.
In the emails, John Halpin, a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, suggests that the Catholicism of some socially conservative Catholics, including members of the Supreme Court, is “an amazing bastardization of the faith…They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.”
Jennifer Palmieri, the Clinton campaign director of communications, responds, “I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion.  Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelical.”
As Pope Francis has often indicated, the Catholic Church is a large tent that allows for many opinions and perspectives within its flaps.  The writers of the emails in question can be seen as Catholics expressing their views about how their faith intersects with public policy and social agenda.
The emails can likewise be interpreted as drafted by Catholics who are concerned that their Church risks becoming irrelevant, rather than being interpreted as smears on a Church they disdain.
Palmieri’s response actually seems more denigrating to Evangelicals than to Catholics.  Progressive Catholics understand precisely what is being communicated in the exchange.  It is not unlike other familiar conversations among clergy and Catholics who have been buoyed by the strides of Pope Francis, and his emphasis on social justice over controversial moral and sexual teachings.
Many Catholics do believe, as the emails suggest, that Church teaching needs to evolve more quickly if it is to have a relevant impact on a rapidly evolving world.  Those Catholics are also sympathetic to the reality that private email exchanges may be less than diplomatic and not always politically correct in expressing those heartfelt concerns.
In responding to an email by Sandy Newman of Voices for Progress, who suggests the need for a “Catholic Spring”, John Podesta writes, “We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this…Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up.”
This hardly sounds like a man intent on creating an “unethical mutiny.”  Rather, it sounds more like a concerned Catholic attempting to align his faith with his political ideals and principles, albeit from his left-of-center perspective.
Pope Francis has said, “A good Catholic meddles in politics, offering the best of himself, so that those who govern can govern.”

The meddling of a few wonky Catholic Clinton campaigners should be less concerning to us than the meddling of far more impious entities who hack private emails and illegally release them, to a populace all too ready to put its own spin on them.

The Podesta Email

Date: 2012-02-11 11:45
Subject:  Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . .

We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United.

Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up. I'll discuss with Tara. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is the other person to consult.

On 2/10/12, Sandy Newman <sandynewman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, John, > >
 This whole controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage even
> though 98% of Catholic women (and their conjugal partners) have used
> contraception has me thinking . . . There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in
> which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and
> the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the
> Catholic church. Is contraceptive coverage an issue around which that could
> happen. The Bishops will undoubtedly continue the fight. Does the Catholic
> Hospital Association support of the Administration's new policy, together
> with "the 98%" create an opportunity?
> > Of course, this idea may just reveal my total lack of understanding of the
> Catholic church, the economic power it can bring to bear against nuns and
> priests who count on it for their maintenance, etc. Even if the idea isn't
> crazy, I don't qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about
 > how one would "plant the seeds of the revolution," or who would plant them.
> Just wondering . . .
> > Hoping you're well, and getting to focus your time in the ways you want.
> > Sandy
> > Sandy Newman, President
> Voices for Progress > 202.669.8754

 > voicesforprogress.org

Sunday, 16 October 2016

It was Martha - the story of a woman who sought the pearl of great price

Ten years ago today, October 16, 2006, my mother passed away. Today would also have been the 90th birthday of my wife's father, Basil. Sadly, Basil passed away two days ago on October 14. He battled cancer for 26 years. In your charity, please pray today at Mass for the repose of his soul or say an Ave for him if you could.

I wrote the post below a few days after her funeral and publish it yearly. Putting aside the insanity of Rome, may this lift your heart as it continues to life mine.


On October 16, 2006 in her 92nd year, my mother was called home to the LORD. She was a woman of great faith in God and taught many lessons to all those who came into contact with her. This was especially true in her last few years. She suffered the loss of her first grandson and then her first son from cancer and bore much physical suffering with faith, trust and humility.

October 16 is, according to the calendar for the Traditional Latin Mass, the Feast of St. Hedwig a medieval Polish duchess; she died on October 14, 1243. She was also maternal aunt of St. Elizabeth of Hungary, incidentally my maternal grandmother's name. So it was then for me a serendipitous moment when at the Mass that morning, the Epistle from the First Letter of Blessed Paul the Apostle to Timothy was read:

Dearly beloved: Honour widows that are widows indeed. But if any widow have children, or grandchildren, let her learn first to govern her own house, and to make a return of duty to her parents: for this is acceptable before God. But she that is a widow indeed, and desolate, let her trust in God and continue in supplications and prayers night and day. For she that liveth in pleasures is dead while she is living. And this give in charge, that they may be blameless. But if any man have not care of his own, and especially of those of his house, he hath denied the faith and is worse than an infidel. Let a widow be chosen of no less than threescore years of age, who hath been the wife of one husband having testimony for her good works, if she have brought up children, if she have received to harbour, if she have washed the saints' feet, if she have ministered to them that suffer tribulation, if she have diligently followed every good work.

The Gospel was the parable about the "pearl of great price." Martha spent her life auctioning all for that pearl. I believe she found it.

A few days before she died it was my 50th birthday. We sat at the kitchen table eating dinner. I was feeding her and told her that 50 years ago we were in the same kitchen and at the same places at table except she was feeding me and now I was feeding her. We had a conversation and she told me that she was ready to go whenever God was to call her. Often we hear or read of those things that are “unexplained” except by coincidence, of course. To those who know and love God, “there are no coincidences.” Not even the fact that the Epistle read that day was one of the two options from the "Common of Holy Women."

That day started as many others. I woke my son for school, I got ready for work and before dashing out the door and bidding her adieu the home care assistant was there to help her get ready for the day and stay with her whilst I was at work.

I had gone to Mass at the Oratory on my lunch hour. I had just gotten back to work around 1:00 PM as the second aid arrived for the shift-change back at home. Her name was Bridget and as she arrived she went into the family room. My mother had only moments earlier complained to Cora, the morning aid, of difficulty breathing and then closed her eyes. Bridget yelled out her name, “Martha, Martha!” and gently slapped her. She stirred and let out a long breath.

My mother Martha, died.

I got the call moments later and on the way home it was clear from speaking to the paramedics that she was gone. She suffered a merciful cardiac arrest, yet because I refused to post a Do Not Resuscitate as experience taught me that would include choking to death, the paramedics were working on her with Adrenalin and heart paddles but were not having any success. I spoke to Bridget and told her that a priest from the local parish was on his way (the Sacrament of the Sick, what we used to call Extreme Unction had already been administered by one of her faithful Oratorian Priests a few weeks earlier.) I asked Bridget to go to my mother’s bedroom and retrieve the sick visit Crucifix from the wall above her bed. (This is a Crucifix which slides off and is placed in a stand; on either side are then candle holders and some of the necessary items for the Sacrament).

When I arrived home my mother’s eyes were open and she seemed semi-conscious but staring straight up to the ceiling, she was unresponsive. The priest arrived a few moments later and anointed her. She was transported to “St. Joe’s,” where my father also died, and she did not regain consciousness again. I sat with her and prayed the rosary and sang the Divine Mercy Chaplet to her. After a priest from the Oratory visited and prayed, and then after consulting with him, I instructed the medical staff to remove the respirator and all the intervention they forced upon her in my earlier absence, it was around 5:00 PM. Just after 8:00 I went outside for some air and a few minutes later my sister came to get me that our mother had died. She had just gone out of the room to the nurses desk to make a phone call. My sister was not out of the room a half-minute and no more than 5 metres away and mother passed. It was like she could not let herself go whilst we were with her.

So, what does this have to do with coincidence?

The next day I called Bridget and asked her to stay on for a few more days to be at the house to tidy and answer the phone and assist with guests. Bridget was quite upset to be sure. She had been with my mother daily for the last year and often spoke of how well she was always treated and “their little talks.” She came to me with apprehension that she really needed to talk to me about something.

The paramedics, with all of their intervention, “brought her back.” It took 14 minutes from the time they began to get a pulse. What was disturbing Bridget was that there was no reaction to their work; nothing, until my car screeched in the driveway.

“I have a pulse!” exclaimed the paramedic. It was simultaneous with the screeching of my tires, said Bridget.

But there is more. Bridget was shaking and in tears.

“David, I had a dream Sunday night," my mother having died on Monday.

She went on to say that she as typical she had forgotten the dream; until at least she went to my mother’s bedroom to get the Crucifix. Upon seeing Jesus on the Cross the dream came back to her for just a moment and then again, it was gone. The house after all was a mass of confusion, police, fire-fighters, the paramedics, and eventually me, and the Priest; Bridget was now a bystander.

After we left for the hospital, Bridget was alone and tidying up and it was what happened then that she was so desperate to tell me.

At that singular moment in time something happened to Bridget that she will never forget. Nor will I.

Bridget recalled for me her dream.
“I was standing on a street-corner in small town with other people. We were laughing at this man dressed in a robe and with long-hair. He said his name was Jesus and we were making fun of him. Just then a young beautiful woman stepped off of the curb and started to cross the street; she turned around and looked at us, she had tears in her eyes, tears of overwhelming joy, she was happy, really happy. It was then that Jesus took her hand and walked across the road with her.”
That was Bridget’s dream, but I didn't understand.

She went on to say that when she woke up from it she was aware that she needed to be more like the woman who walked across the street. That she needed to have “more faith in Jesus.”

I told her that it seemed like a pretty plausible conclusion.

“Wait” Bridget said, “There is more, you don't understand."

I waited and listened as she started to cry.

“David, I remembered the dream only for a moment when carrying the Cross.”

“When I was tidying up I put the Cross on the end-table over there.”

“Yes, it looks nice there” I replied.

“No, David, you don’t understand, the picture, the picture beside the Cross.”

“Yes, Bridget, what is it?”

“That picture of your mother at graduation.” Bridget started to cry.

“It was her; she was the girl in my dream, it was Martha!"


Saturday, 15 October 2016

Bergoglio directly contradicts Our Lord Jesus Christ - Priest calls him out as a "False Prophet"

This writer had the joy of meeting the late Father Peter Carota and singing with him, the Holy Sacrifice. Father Carota's blog continues on, undertaken by a friend of the late priest's.

A post today is a must-read from a diocesan priest, "Father Jerome."

The disgraceful and blasphemous statement by Bergoglio that "it is not right to convince someone of your faith," is the greatest evidence, thus far of how bad it has become in Rome.

How stupid are Catholics that they cannot see it.

Can you see it now when he defies Christ himself?

"Go therefore and make disciples of all nations."

By Father Jerome 10/15/2016:

After Jesus’ resurrection, Our Lord said “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations.”—Mt 28:19. To the contrary, Pope Francis said this week: “It is not right to convince someone of your faith.”
This means Pope Francis is now directly opposing Jesus Christ, and it is time for me to speak up.

I am an American diocesan priest who does not belong to any congregation.   To write what I am about to write would normally be tantamount to forfeiting my soul in most centuries of Church history.  I realize that.  But I am so convinced that we have a false-prophet on the throne of Peter that I have reached the point that silence on Pope Francis is now tantamount to a grave sin of omission.


Bergoglio denounces true ecumenism - praises the heretic Luther! Will he be the next canonised?

Fairies invade Vatican!

Bergoglio has, with his own words, condemned himself and set himself against his predecessors. 

"It is not right to convince someone of your faith," says this Bergoglio.

"Go therefore and teach all nations," said Jesus Christ.

Who do you choose?

Are you a Christian or a Papolater?

In an address yesterday, the 99th anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima, Bergoglio stated that proselytism is "venom" and a "threat to Christian unity."

How illogical can he be? He must repent of this error.

What a betrayer of Our Lord Jesus Christ and His cry, "that they all be one." One in Him! One in His Church. Lutherans as individuals must come home, along with Anglicans, Presbyterians, Evangelicals, Eastern Orthodox. How can they come home when Popes preach to them to stay where they are? Why would the Orthodox desire union with Rome when it is overseen by a cabal of malefactors and heretics!

It is only through proselytism, with clarity and charity, that we will achieve "Christian unity." 

Martin Luther has led millions of souls to Hell. There is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church. Should God choose to save those who are not Catholic is up to Him and beyond our knowledge of certainly. What we do know is that it is only by being baptised and in the bosom of the Catholic Church, can we be saved. Vatican II did not change this, notwithstanding its ambiguity and pastoral overtures.

This Bergoglio would rather see Lutherans continue on their path of error following a heretic priest in his blasphemy than come home to the One True Church.

The time has long since passed for a denouncement of this Pope.

What a disgusting and sickening display, a statue of Martin Luther together with the Bishop of Rome. A heretic. A blasphemer. A fornicator who led millions of souls in Hell.

As Brian wonders in the combox, will he dare to lift the excommunication of Luther?

God help us all.

Image result for pope luther statue

(ANSA) - Vatican City, October 13 - Pope Francis told a group of mostly Lutheran pilgrims on Thursday that proselytism was a potential threat to Christian unity.
"The last thing you must do is 'to say, to convince'. It's not right to convince someone of your faith," he said.
"Proselytism is the strongest venom against the path of ecumenism".
The pope was speaking to around 1,000 pilgrims in the Vatican - most of them German Lutherans - who are in Rome as part of ecumenical preparations for the 500th anniversary of the beginning of the Lutheran reformation.
"The Apostle Paul tells us that, by virtue of our baptism, we all form the one Body of Christ," the pope said.
"The different members, in fact, are one body. This is why we belong to each other and when one suffers, all suffer, when one rejoices, all rejoice. Let us continue with confidence on our ecumenical journey, because we know that, beyond the many open questions that still separate us, we are already united.
What unites us is much more than what divides us".

Friday, 14 October 2016

Thomas J. Rosica vs. Raymond J. de Souza: Whom do you trust? Rosica slanders de Souza and in so doing adds, Cardinal Collins to his screed!

Father Raymond de Souza, a Canadian priest of the Archdiocese of Kingston has been publicly slandered on Twitter by the ever more irrelevant Thomas J. Rosica.

Barona has the story.


The fact is, Tom Rosica and the rest of Team Bergoglio can't stand the pressure. 

They can't stand it from me and you can't stand it from one of their peers. They can't stand being shown that they're wrong. 

Amoris Laetitia, that stinking piece of heresy and sacrilege will be abrogated. It will be denounced by a future Pope. Mark my words.

Thomas Cardinal Collins of Toronto was one of the 13. Rosica seems to have no prudence as he lashes out at him too. How much longer will the Archbishop of Toronto tolerate this Basilian in Toronto?

Is Tom Rosica saying that Cardinal Collins is imprudent and signed a document that he did not read? That he did not understand? He clearly seems to be saying this and that Cardinal Collins' actions, all the 12 others, was an attempt to "thwart the synodal process." Not my words. Tom Rosica's!

He accuses Father de Souza of "false reporting" and questions his faithfulness to the "magisterium." Quite the accusation to make against Father de Souza.

Who does Rosica think he is to calumniate another priest over social media? The Catholic Herald is a well-regarded journal, it is widely read in England. 

What a disgrace.

Mark my words well.

Their time is almost over. 

They can enjoy it for now. They have their reward.


Friday, 23 October 2015

Cardinal Thomas Collins defends his faithful and just Synod actions in manipulative story by the Toronto Star. Will the Basilians have him STFU too?

Cardinal Collins is one of the thirteen or whatever number it was that signed and sent a letter to Pope Francis at the beginning of the Synod. A few days ago, Cardinal Donald Wuerl lashed out in a Jesuitical periodical that some people, insinuating the thirteen, "just don't like the Pope." According to a Toronto Star reporter, Father Thomas J. Rosica sent the article to journalists allegedly stating, "I fully share Cardinal Wuerl's assessment."

Florence defies Bergoglio and his henchmen

I'm sorry friends to keep giving you bad news. Some days I wonder if I should post little kittens or cute little puppies to make you feel better. Then I slap myself silly.

No, you need to be a grown-up Catholic and face the truth about what evil men are doing to our Faith.

We were warned.

Matthew 13:24-30

Another parable he proposed to them, saying: The kingdom of heaven is likened to a man that sowed good seeds in his field. But while men were asleep, his enemy came and oversowed cockle among the wheat and went his way. And when the blade was sprung up, and had brought forth fruit, then appeared also the cockle. And the servants of the goodman of the house coming said to him: Sir, didst thou not sow good seed in thy field? whence then hath it cockle? And he said to them: An enemy hath done this. And the servants said to him: Wilt thou that we go and gather it up? And he said: No, lest perhaps gathering up the cockle, you root up the wheat also together with it. Suffer both to grow until the harvest, and in the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers: Gather up first the cockle, and bind it into bundles to burn, but the wheat gather ye into my barn.

And we can sing it out with joy and hope because we know what is coming upon us and we know the end of the story. 

All praised by Jesus Christ.

Now and forever. Amen.

In Rome Yes, In Florence No. Here’s How “Amoris Laetitia” Is Dividing the Church
In the pope’s diocese, the divorced and remarried can receive communion, in other Italian dioceses no. Because every bishop is deciding as he wishes. A manual by Cardinal Antonelli for confessors who want to remain faithful to perennial doctrine
 by Sandro Magister  
ROME, October 14, 2016 – Pope Francis has said plainly right from the first lines of “Amoris Laetitia” that “unity of teaching and practice is certainly necessary in the Church, but this does not preclude various ways of interpreting some aspects of that teaching or drawing certain consequences from it.”

Wednesday, 12 October 2016


As if we did not know.

Name Bella Dodd, for one, at least she repented.

This is right out of the playbook of Saul Alinsky.

Any Catholic who votes for Hillary Rodham Clinton is committing a grievous act and may potentially a grievous mortal sin. And you're afraid of a potty mouth?

Podesta is, allegedly, a catholic.

Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and the rest - Antichrist minions and anti-Catholic bigots

From: Vox Cantoris [mail to: voxcantoris@rogers.com]
Sent: October 11, 2016 7:57 PM
To: 'jhalpin@americanprogress.org'; 'john.podesta@gmail.com'
Subject: email

This Catholic knows what subsidiarity and Thomism is. It is also obvious what anti-Catholic bigots look like too.
Vox Cantoris

Image result for john podesta wife


Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri and Center for American Progress fellow John Halpin mocked conservative Catholicism as an "amazing bastardization of the faith" in new emails released by WikiLeaks.

In the fresh batch of emails released as part of a reported cache of "Podesta emails," with the subject line "Conservative Catholicism," Halpin also mocks News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch and Wall Street Journal managing editor Robert Thomson for being Catholic.

"Ken Auletta's latest piece on Murdoch in the New Yorker starts off with the aside that both Murdoch and Robert Thompson, managing editor of the WSJ, are raising their kids Catholic. Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus," Halpin wrote in a 2011 missive to Podesta and Palmieri.

"Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy," he added.

Palmieri, who MRCTV reports was also with the Center for American Progress at the time, added in the email chain that she believes Murdoch, Thomson, and many other conservatives are Catholic because they think it's "the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion."

"Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals," she added.

Halpin thought Palmieri made an "excellent point."

"Excellent point. They can throw around 'Thomistic' thought and 'subsidiarity' and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they're talking about," he wrote.

John Podesta, chairman of Clinton's campaign, was included in the email chain but didn't comment. The email was posted to WikiLeaks along with over 1,000 Podesta emails that were hacked. The Russian government is suspected to be behind the cyber attack.

The New Yorker article referenced in the email comes from the April 2011 issue and is titled "Murdoch's Best Friend".

Thomson likes to remain slightly hidden. But he is perhaps Murdoch's only close friend. The two men are both from Australia, are married to Chinese women, and were born (thirty years apart) on the same day, March 11th. In restaurants, they order Australian wines and delight in discussing that country's politics. They are also both raising their children as Catholics," Auletta wrote in the piece in describing how similar the men are.

"It surprised me how important it was to both of them that their children were baptized and instructed," one family intimate noted in the piece. "This is something they did together. The four kids sat down with a priest."

Congratulations Vatican II

Image result for vatican ii

Rorate has a table of statistics for the United States. As a Canadian, if anyone out there has anything similar for Canada, please advise.

The originals can be found here:


Father Hunwicke writes today about Newman, Liberalism and the Antichrist. Newman prophetically saw our time. 


Ponder these.

The next time Tom Rosica praises Vatican II, throw these facts up to him. 

The definition of insanity is repeating the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. I have asked other rhetorically, "what good has come from Vatican II?" 

Please, if anything good has come from that rotten Council and the men behind it, do advise. 

Monday, 10 October 2016

We are being punished. Vatican II IS the problem. Do not lose your Faith!

From Mundabor.

"If Francis were to die tomorrow, and were to be replaced by a “safe V II” Pope, what would be the consequence? What would a hypothetical JP III do that would prevent, one day, the election of a Francis II? Nothing, absolutely nothing! We would have more V II rubbish; which, in time, would unavoidably lead to the appointment of a faithless, lewd old man like Francis. A new, “moderate” V II Pope would mean more World Youth Day, more Assisi gatherings, more ecumenism, more pacifism, more search for easy popularity, more Korans thankfully accepted as gift, more pope concerts and mega-masses, more watering down of truth, more of all we have seen from John XXIII until 2013. The slippery slope that begins with a John XXIII must perforce end with a Francis, or worse. 
No, I don't think the Lord will save us from the worst. It seems to me that this is not God's plan. It seems to me that the savage arrogance of V II must now be paid in full. It seems to me, in other words, that the absolutely lunatic times the Evil Clown is preparing for us are allowed by God to show us the utter lunacy of the rebellion of V II. Unless we are made to eat all the excrements that Francis and, very probably, his successors will dish us we will never understand the monstrosity of Vatican II in the first place."

Read it all.

Bergoglian Cardinal De Kesel praises sodomy!

Image result for cardinal de kesel

Jozef De Kesel, the Archbishop of Mechelen-Brussel, a newly named Cardinal by Bergoglio openly supports the "gay" lifestyle.

As quoted in Crux, De Kesel said:

Asked about gay people, De Kesel said, “I have much respect for gays,” including “their way of living their sexuality.”

Did you ever think you would live to live see the day when a Cardinal of the Holy Catholic Church would openly support anal intercourse, oral copulation, fisting, felching, gerbilling, sado-masochism, and public-nudity amongst other perversions.

Imagine, that since De Kesel supports "their way of living their sexuality" he cares nothing about the diseases, mental health issues, suicides and early death and eternal damnation suffered by these men and women.

One can only conclude that Jozef De Kesel is a sodomite himself.

Way to go Bergoglio!

The gift that keeps on giving

The announcement of new Cardinals by the Bishop of Rome has been made. Rorate Caeli has some background.

The list is disturbing. From Cupich to De Kesel, this is a list of men who are cut out of the mould of Bergoglio.

The Bishop of Rome can appoint whomever he wishes to the cardinalate, that is his right. There was, however, a reason why certain Sees, were elevated and yet, we see them ignored. Indianapolis? Really? Not Gomez in Los Angeles, the largest Catholic diocese in the United States? Not Chaput in Philadelphia? Where is Lépine, the Archbishop of Montreal, a historical Cardinalate See? There predecessors are all over 80 or deceased, there is no excuse, except, political.

I highlight only these, not knowing much about others around the world except for Brussels, where De Kesel remains an ardent Kasperite and hand picked by the paedophile protecting, "mafia" leading Danneels.

The next conclave is being set-up to give us another Bergoglio, or worse.


Except what this will do is show even more the deep split in the Church between faithful Catholics and heretics. Between those of us who love Christ and with His grace, do our best to live His Commandments and those who are modernists, heretics, who discount the Law and the Truth. 

These men, and I accuse Jorge Berogoglio himself, have set-out to wipe out the papacies of Benedict XVI and John Paul II. To these men, these malefactors, and again, I accuse Bergoglio, it is as if we are picking up right where we left off with Paul VI. They are out to destroy the last vestiges of the Faith.

Perhaps this is necessary. The rot has been there, hiding, plotting and undermining the faith under John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Now, it is out in the open. 

This will not end well. There will be a schism. 

The question remains, where will Bergoglio be when it comes?

Image result for pope francis gift